Another Triumph for Terrorism (082309) by J. F. Kelly, Jr.

A commentary by J. F. Kelly, Jr.

Convicted Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was released from a Scottish prison where he was supposed to be serving a minimum 27-year term. He was sentenced by a Scottish judge in 2001 for the murder of 270 innocent persons who died in the explosion and crash of a New York-bound U.S. jetliner over the town of Lockerbie, Scotland.

Scotland’s Justice Secretary Kenny Mac Askill released Mr. al-Megrahi, who reportedly has terminal prostate cancer, on “compassionate grounds” after serving less than a third of his minimum sentence. Where, one wonders, is the compassion for the relatives of the victims who included many young Americans en route home for the Christmas holiday season?

Mr. al-Megrahi was flown to Libya where a joyous welcome awaited. Crowds of cheering Libyans waved Lybyan flags and filled the streets of Tripoli. There was little doubt over what they were cheering about. “We all believe he is a hero,” said the editor of a Tripoli newspaper. His release may well inspire other “heroes” to attempt similar deeds.

The United States government had strongly opposed the release of this convicted terrorist. It had urged that he at least be kept under house arrest. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that the United States is “deeply disappointed” by this action and President Barack Obama reportedly expressed our government’s disapproval to the United Kingdom. U.S. family members of the victims expressed emotions ranging from outrage to profound sorrow at having to relive their grief.

Mr. al-Megrahi never expressed remorse and steadfastly maintained his innocence. Some British relatives of the victims reportedly believe him and feel that the investigation was flawed. The fact is, however, that he was turned over by the Libyan government to face charges in Scotland. Mr. al-Megrahi, moreover, dropped his second and most recent appeal. And Mr. Mac Askill himself reportedly said that he believes al-Megrahi to be guilty. Nevertheless, said the Justice Secretary, “outrage cannot and should not be a basis of who we are, the values we seek to uphold and the faith and beliefs we seek to live by.”

These are noble and heartwarming sentiments and one hears them often today in the United States from those who believe that we pursue the war on terrorism, if it can still be called a war, with far too much alacrity. Words like these were heard often in the debate on interrogation procedures and the treatment of terrorist detainees. They were prominent in the tortured debate that led to the unwise decision to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, arguably the most modern, comfortable and humane detention facility in the world, as a symbolic concession to the peace-at-any-price crowd.

Americans, like the Scots, are indeed a compassionate people but Americans throughout their history have generally demanded that mass murderers pay for their atrocities with their lives or at least by forfeiting their freedom forever. Mr. al-Megrahi served about eleven and a half days for each of the innocent lives he was convicted of taking. That hardly constitutes a repayment of his debt to society and it is a slap in the face to the still-grieving families of the victims. But it does provide a couple of lessons that we should bear in mind. First, justice systems and values differ widely, even among western countries. We should be very skeptical, therefore, about subjecting ourselves to the jurisdiction of international courts and some aspects of international law. Second, criminal justice systems in general simply aren’t up to the job of dealing with terrorists, not, at least if we want to deter them or keep them off the streets.

In real wars, compassion can get in the way of victory and it can also get people killed. If we are still serious about the war on terrorism, we eventually have to get over this notion that terrorists are just criminals to be dealt with by criminal justice systems. As we saw in the Lockerbie bomber case, they just may not have the stomach for it.

Copyright 2009 by J. F. Kelly, Jr.

Views: 8

Tags: current events, politics

Comment by Jim Desai on August 24, 2009 at 10:11am
I too have doubts about the wisdom of releasing the Lockerbie bomber, but I do know one thing.

Terrorism cannot be combated by terrorism.

This is the biggest mistake the Bush administration made. By abandoning our constitution, our laws, and our values, the Bush Administration dragged us down to the level of the terrorists, and did far more damage to our country, than bin-laden ever dreamed of in his worst nightmares.

It demonstrated incredible shortsightedness on the part of the Bush administration and all those conservatives that supported them. It also showed their lack of confidence in our country, and what it has stood for for the past 300 years.

I was very chagrined to read that Bush secretly ordered his elite special forces teams to kill bin-laden. I would have loved to have him brought to New York, and handed over to the NYPD. I would have loved to have given him all the protections of our constitution, and let him swear on whatever holy book he believes in, and them ask him..

"what holy book or what God condones the murder of 3000 innocent office goers.""

His answer, or the lack of answer would have demonstrated the moral bankruptcy of violence, and the power and glory of our American system, and our American values.

Instead of that we chose to open concentration camps, and torture cells etc. We not only lost the solidarity and respect of our friends, we also aided and abetted the enemy.

If we truly believe in something, we need to continue believing in it even when the believing get tough.
Comment by Jim Desai on August 24, 2009 at 11:48am
The humane situation at Guantanamo is irrelevant. The problem is Guantanamo is Illegal. Not by the enemy standards but by our own standards. This what makes it untenable.

This single vein of illegality runs through many of JF's posts.

Denying women abortion funding in any healthcare system, present or proposed, is also illegal; by our own standards; until congress decides otherwise.

Boarding ships on the high seas is also illegal. It is called piracy.

People who promote these and similar actions would do well to pay heed to this issue.

Comment (keep it clean & on topic)

You need to be a member to add comments. It only takes 60 seconds to join. Get breaking news alerts!

Join News | Coronado's Local Newspaper

Support Local Business

Advertise on

Advertise on

© 2015

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service